Approaches to Sustainable Development in Contemporary Museology

Irene Campolmi

Abstract


Sustainable development has become a leading value of the 21st century society. Throsby’s and Hutter’s recent studies on inter and intra-generational equity, diversity maintenance and interdependence have demonstrated that sustainability values promote a different perspective on cultural institutions. Particularly, they incite to reorganize the production and consumption patterns, and rethink about the construction of meanings in permanent displays. The paper wants to explore how sustainability principles are an approach to develop a “sustainable museology”, which cares about making visitors more critic and aware of the political, sociological, epistemological and cultural implications that lay behind the making of exhibitions. Museums undertaking a sustainable development of their narrative making processes overpass the Foucauldian idea of art museums as heterotopy, (space of otherness), and approach that of archétopy. This model offers rooms to rethink about narratives as stakeholders’ collective processes capable to “meet the needs of the present without compromising those of the future generations”, as stated in the “Brundtland Commision” Report of 1987. The last display done by the Berlin Neue Nationalgalerie is analysed as a case-study for archétopy.

Il paper analizza il concetto di sostenibilità nelle politiche governative dei musei d’arte. Lo studio osserva tale valore da un punto di vista sia teorico che pratico e cita l’esempio dei grandi musei europei, facendo più volte riferimento al caso della Tate Modern di Londra. Se da un lato l’argomento è esplicitamente collegato ai musei d’arte in quanto essi operano per la sostenibilità del bene comune, dall’altro i musei europei hanno basato le proprie politiche culturali adottando il così detto approccio “three bottom” già intrapreso dalle grandi aziende e dalle business companies. Tale approccio si basa sull’elaborazione di politiche attente alla sostenibilità ambientale, economica e sociale che i musei scelgono di adottare per incrementare i propri finanziamenti. Ne risulta che l’attenzione alla sostenibilità delle politiche governative di un museo è legata a questioni economiche piuttosto che culturali. Tuttavia, la sostenibilità delle politiche culturali nei musei d’arte moderna risiede non solo nel seguire strategie economiche e ambientali, ma principalmente nel creare iniziative che offrano nuove prospettive curatoriali e idee manageriali. Il modello di museo attento alla sostenibilità delle proprie politiche oltrepassa la nozione foucauldiana che il museo d’arte sia “eterotopia”, e cioè spazio dove l’arte viene presentata come un fenomeno che accade lontano dalla realtà. Al contrario, tale modello agisce come “archetopia”, ovvero come luogo in cui l’elaborazione di decisioni, narrative e significati legati alla collezione e alla storia dell’arte coinvolge tutti gli stakeholders (curatori, visitatori e trustees) sin dal principio (archè) del processo creativo.


Full Text

PDF (English)

Riferimenti bibliografici


Baia Curioni S., Forti L., Martinazzoli L. (2009), Contemporary Art Museums in Europe. A Comparative Study on their Stakeholders Management, AIMAC 2009 – 10th International Conference on Arts and Cultural Management (Dallas, Southern Methodist University, 2009), Quaderno ASK.

Bateson G. (2000), Steps to an ecology of mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brandlogic (2012), Sustainability Leadership Report. Measuring Perception vs Reality for 100 Global Brands, ISM, CDR Analytics, available on-line at: http://www.sustainabilityleadershipreport.com, 23.09.2013.

Cameron F. (2003), Transcending Fear – Engaging Emotions and Opinions – A Case for Museums in the 21st Century, «Open Museum Journal», n. 6, available on-line at: http://hosting.collectionsaustralia.net/omj/vol6/pdfs/ cameron.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Cameron F. (2009), Museum Collections, Documentation and the Shifting Knowledge Paradigms, in Museums in a Digital Age, edited by R. Parry, Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 80-95.

Cameron F., Kelly L., editors (2010), Hot Topics, Public Culture, Museums, Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Campe J.H. (1809), Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, Brunswick.

Casini L. (2011), ‘Italian Hours’: The globalization of cultural property law, in Symposium: The New Public Law in a Global Dis(Order) – A Perspective from Italy, «International Journal of Constitutional Law», 9, n. 2, pp. 369-393.

Cassar M. (1995), Environmental Management: Guidelines for Museums and Galleries, London: Taylor & Francis.

Collins J.C, Porras J.I. (1994), Built to Last. Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, New York: Harper Business Essentials.

Collins J.C., Porras J.I. (1996), Building your Company’s Vision, «Harvard Business Review», September, pp. 65-78. de Leeuw R., Acidini C., Berg K. (2005), Lending to Europe. Recommendations on Collection Mobility for European Museums, European Council Resolution 13839/04, April 2005, available on-line at: http://www.codart.nl/images/Lending_to_Europe.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Deloche B. (2007), La nouvelle culture: la mutation des pratiques sociales ordinaires et l’avenir des institutions culturelles, Paris: l’Harmattan.

Dillard J., Dujon V., King M.C. (2009), Understanding the Social Dimensionof Sustainability, London: Routledge.

Duncan C. (1993), The Aesthetics of Power: Essays in Critical Art History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eilertsen L., Bugge Amundsen A. (2012), Museum Policies in Europe 1990- 2010. Negotiating Professional and Political Utopia, Linköping: Linköping University Press, available on-line at: http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:557284 23.09.2013.

Foucault M. (1973), The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Vintage Press.

Foucault M. (1975), Surveiller et Punir, Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault M. (1984), Of Other Spaces, «Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité»,October, 2nd ed., pp. 46-49.

Fraser A. (2005), From the Critique of Institutions to an Institution of Critique, «Artforum International», 44, n. 1, pp. 278-283.

Georgescu-Roegen N. (1971), The Entrophy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Graham B., Cook S. (2010), Rethinking Curating. Art After New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Greenberg R., Ferguson B., Nairne S. (1996), Thinking about Exhibitions, London: Routledge.

Griffi n D., Abraham M. (2007), The Effective Management of Museums: Cohesive Leadership and Visitor-focused Public Programming, in Museum Management and Marketing, edited by R. Janes, R. Sandell, London: Routledge, pp. 104-141.

Grober U. (2012), Sustainability. A Cultural History, Devon: Green Books.

Hansen T. (2011), (Re)-Staging the Art Museum, Berlin: Revolver Publishing.

Hawkes J. (2001), The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability. Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning, Sidney: Cultural Development Network Publisher.

Hutter M. (1998), Communication Productivity: A Major Cause for the Changing Output of Art Museums, «Journal of Cultural Economics», n. 22, pp. 99-112.

Hutter M. (1996), The Impact of Cultural Economics on Economic Theory, «Journal of Cultural Economics», n. 20, pp. 263-268.

Janes R. (2009), Museums in a Troubled World: Renewal, Irrelevance, Collapse?, London: Routledge. Janes R., Sandell R. (2007), Museum Management and Marketing, London: Routledge.

Koster E. (2006), The Relevant Museum: A Refl ection on Sustainability, in Reinventing the Museum. The Evolving Conversation on the Paradigm Shift, edited by G. Anderson, Plymouth, (UK): Altamira Press, pp. 202-211.

Lang C., Reeve J., Wollard V. (2006), The Responsive Museum. Working with Audiences in the Twenty-First Century, Hampshire: Ashgate. Latouche S. (2003), Décoloniser l’imaginaire. Le Pensée Créative contre l’Économie de l’Absurde, Paris: Parangon.

Latour B. (2005), Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: University Press.

Levy M., Jouyet J.P. (2006), L’économie de l’immatériel: la croissance de demain. Rapport de la Commission sur l’économie de l’immatériel, available on-line at: http://www.iesf.fr/upload/pdf/economie_de_l_immateriel.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Lindqvist K. (2012), Museum fi nances: challenges beyond economic crises, «Museum Management and Curatorship», 27, n. 1, pp. 1-15.

Lord B., Lord G.D., Nicks J. (1989), The Cost of Collecting, London: HMSO. Macalik J., edited by (2013), Discursive Space. Breaking Barriers to Effective Spatial Communication in Museums, International Conference organized by Ryerson University and Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO, Toronto, 20th-23rd June 2013).

MacLeod S., Hourston Hanks L., Hale J., edited by (2012), Museum Making: narratives, architectures, exhibitions, London and New-York: Routledge.

Madan R. (2011), Sustainable Museums. Strategies for 21st century Museums, Edinburg: MuseumEtc.

Mairesse F. (2005), Collection Strategies Now!, in Petterson et al. 2005, pp. 54-71.

Mansfi eld E. (2007), Making Art History. A Changing Discipline and Its Institutions, London: Routledge.

Maricola P. (2006), What makes a Great Exhibition?, Philadelphia: The Pew Centre for Arts and Heritage Press.

Marstine J. (2006), New Museum. Theory and Practice. An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Merriman N. (2008), Museum Collections and Sustainability, «Cultural Trends», 17, n. 1, pp. 3-21.

Merrit E.E. (2008), Beyond the Cabinet of Curiosities. Towards a Modern Rationale of Collecting, in Connecting collecting, edited by E. Fagerborg, E. von Unge, Samdok, Nordiska Museet, available on-line at: http://www.sverigesmuseer.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/3494.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Museum Association (2005), Collections for the Future, London: MA Online Publishing, available on-line at: http://www.museumsassociation.org/download?id=11121>, 23.09.2013.

Museum Association (2008), Sustainability and Museums. Your chance to make the difference, London: MA On-line Publishing, available on-line at: http://www.museumsassociation.org/download?id=16398, 23.09.2013.

Network of European Museum Association, German Museums Association (2010), Sustainability in Museums, «NEMO News», n. 1, 2010, pp. 1-5, available on-line at: http://www.ne-mo.org/fi leadmin/Dateien/public/NEMONews/NemoNews_1_10_Sustainability.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Parr A. (2009), Hijacking Sustainability, London-Cambridge: MIT Press.

Payne O. (2012), Inspiring a Sustainable Behavior. Nineteen Ways to Ask for a Change, London: Routledge.

Pekarik A.J. (2010), From Knowing to Not Knowing: Moving Beyond ‘Outcomes’, in Reinventing the Museum. The Evolving Conversation on the Paradigm Shift (2nd ed.), edited by G. Anderson, Plymouth (UK): Altamira Press, pp. 401-411.

Petterson S., Hagedorn-Saupe M., Jyrkkiö T., Weij A. (2005), Encouraging Collection Mobility – A Way Forward for Museums in Europe, Finnish National Gallery, Erfgoed Nederland, Institut Für Museumsforschung, Staatliche Museen Zu Berlin – Preussischer Kulturbesitz, available on-line at: http://www.lending-for-europe.eu/fi leadmin/CM/public/handbook/Encouraging_Collections_Mobility_A4.pdf, 23.09.2013.

O’Neill M. (2002), The good enough visitor, in Museums, Society and Inequality, edited by R. Sandell, London: Routledge, pp. 24-40.

Scott C.A. (2002), Measuring Social Value, in Museums, Society and Inequality, edited by R. Sandell, London: Routledge, pp. 41-55.

Scott C.A. (2009), Exploring the Evidence Base for Museum Value, «Museum Management and Curatorship», 24, n. 3, pp. 195-212.

Silverman L.H., O’ Neill M. (2004), Change and Complexity in the 21st Century Museums. The Real Relics in Our Museums May Be the Ways We Think and Work, «Museum News», 83, n. 6, pp. 36-43.

Simon N. (2010), The Participatory Museum, Santa Cruz: MUSEUM 20 Publisher. Smithsonian Institution (2012), Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan, Washington: Smithsonian Institution.

Stanisweski M.A. (1995), Believing is Seeing. Creating the Culture of Art, New York: Penguin Book.

Stanisweski M.A. (1998), The Power of Display. A History of Museum Installations at the Museum of Modern Art, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Suchy S. (2004), Leading with Passion: Change Management in the 21st Century Museums, Laham: Altamira Press.

Throsby D. (2010), The Economics of Cultural Policy, Cambridge: University Press.

Throsby D. (2002), Cultural Capital and Sustainability Concepts in the Economics of Cultural Heritage, in Assessing the Value of Cultural Heritage, edited by M. De La Torre, Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 101-118.

United Nations (1995), Our Creative Diversity, Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

United Nations (1987), Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: University Press, available on-line at: http://www.un-documents.net/ourcommon-future.pdf, 23.09.2013.

Velthuis O., Lind M. (2012), Contemporary Art and Its Commercial Markets, Berlin: Sternberg Press.

Weil S.H. (2005), A success/failure matrix for museums, «Museum News», 84, n. 1, pp. 36-40.

Weil S.H. (1997), Museum and the Public, «Museum Management and Curatorship», 16, n. 3, pp. 257-271.

Worts D. (2010), Culture in the winds of change: Fostering a ‘culture of sustainability’ and making the case for cultural indicators, «International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability», 6, n. 5, pp. 241-254.

Jung Y. (2011), The art museum ecosystem: a new alternative model, «Museum Management and Curatorship», 26, n. 4, pp. 321-338.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/563

Copyright (c) 2015 IL CAPITALE CULTURALE. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage

Licenza Creative Commons edita dall'eum e gestita dall'Università di Macerata, Dipartimento di Scienze della formazione, dei beni culturali e del turismo, Sezione di Beni Culturali, piazzale Bertelli 1, 62100 Macerata, Italia.

Adotta specifiche politiche per la gestione e protezione dei dati.